Can You Claim Your Dog as a Tax Dependent? Exploring a Unique Case

If you’ve ever scrutinized your pet’s vet bills, grooming expenses, daycare charges, and specialized food purchases, dreaming of a world where you can deduct these costs, you’re not alone. There's a real case that might resonate with many pet lovers. An attorney is actually arguing that her beloved dog should be recognized as a dependent by the IRS.

In December 2025, attorney Amanda Reynolds from New York took an unconventional step by filing a lawsuit against the IRS. She wants her eight-year-old golden retriever, Finnegan, to be acknowledged as her legal dependent for tax purposes.

While the case might sound extraordinary, it also highlights a common query among taxpayers: Are any pet expenses deductible, and if not, why?

Let’s delve into the lawsuit, what tax law says, and some scenarios where animal-related tax benefits may apply.

The Lawsuit: Arguing for a Dog Dependent

Reynolds claims that Finnegan meets the IRS’s dependency criteria:

He resides with her permanently.
He generates no income.
She covers over half of his support costs, surpassing $5,000 yearly on necessities like food, healthcare, and daycare.

A national media outlet highlighted Reynolds’s assertion, declaring, “For all intents and purposes, Finnegan equates to a daughter and surely qualifies as a ‘dependent.’”

Reynolds also argues that current tax laws discriminate against dependent individuals based on “species” (an Equal Protection argument) and that not recognizing pet dependencies constitutes an unlawful “taking” (a Fifth Amendment concern).

Legal Proceedings Update

The lawsuit is filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, currently paused as a federal magistrate judge granted a stay on discovery. This pause allows the IRS time to file a dismissal motion.

According to court documents, the judge mentions the unique yet urgent consideration of treating pets as tax dependents. However, the judge also indicates that these claims may not succeed, labeling them “unmeritorious on their face.”

Given the circumstances, this case draws attention, yet the court's skepticism marks an uphill battle.

Understanding Tax Law: Why Pets Don’t Qualify as Dependents

Here’s what the lawsuit faces: tax law establishes dependents as “individuals.”

The IRC Section 152 outlines a dependent as a “qualifying child” or “qualifying relative,” with the statutory language emphasizing “individual,” traditionally interpreted as a human being.

This interpretation underlies why IRS documents and regulations don’t allow pets to be listed as dependents. Dependents are people with Social Security numbers or taxpayer IDs, and related benefits focus on human family and household connections.

Although Reynolds posits that Finnegan meets the dependency criteria (in terms of no income, cohabitation, and support), the tax code fundamentally doesn’t consider animals as “individuals.”

Exploring Tax Benefits for Animals

While typical pet costs aren’t deductible, exceptions exist. Here’s actionable insight:

1) Service Animal Deductions

Training, obtaining, and caring for a certified service animal aiding with a disability may be labeled as medical expenses under itemized deductions.

The IRS guidelines articulate that deductible medical expenses require itemization and surpassing the AGI threshold, with service animal costs directly tied to medical care eligible as deductions.

Clarification: Emotional support animals aren’t labeled as service animals under federal law; service animals perform distinct tasks relating to a disability.

2) Business Animals and Deductible Expenses

An animal involved in a business—such as a protective guard dog or pest-controlling creature—might have its expenses deemed as standard business costs.

A guard dog protecting company assets
Animals tasked with pest management

These expenses may become deductible business costs, contingent on documentation and a confirmed business purpose.

3) Animal Fostering and Charitable Deductions

Animal fostering expenses for qualified organizations could, in some instances, generate deductions as charitable contributions, with strict monitoring and record-keeping.

Conclusion for Pet Owners

This lawsuit taps into an emotional reality—pets are cherished family members for many, yet the tax code is driven by legal definitions, not sentiments.

Currently:

Animals aren’t recognized as dependents on federal tax returns.
Pet expenses like food, grooming, and standard care remain personal and non-deductible.
Specific animal-related costs may be deductible in certain scenarios—service animals, business support animals, and fostering-related charitable actions.

Even though Reynolds's case may not revolutionize the tax framework by itself, it underscores a rising awareness of the use and care of pets within households amidst clear tax policy delineations between “family” and “property.”

In closing, the key takeaway is: before assuming deductible items, validate with IRS standards and stipulations.

Share this article...

Facebook

Twitter WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Pocket Reddit Email

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .