Learning Center
We keep you up to date on the latest tax changes and news in the industry.

Understanding Michigan's Cannabis Tax Legal Dispute

Michigan is currently embroiled in a significant legal battle over a newly introduced 24% wholesale marijuana tax, which is already under constitutional scrutiny. As the initial court hearings are underway, this case is garnering national attention due to its potential impact not only on cannabis pricing but also on voter-approved laws and taxation policies across various states.

Even if you’re not a cannabis user or are residing far from Michigan, the implications of this case could resonate broadly. It might influence how other states design, revise, and justify cannabis taxes and could serve as a prelude to forthcoming legal clashes as the market expands.

Here’s what every American should be aware of.

Details of Michigan’s Proposal

As part of its 2025–2026 fiscal strategy, Michigan's legislature sanctioned a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, aimed at generating revenue for infrastructure improvements. This tax would be applied at a stage earlier than usual in the supply chain, before retail sales occur.

Michigan currently enforces two other taxes:

  • 10% excise tax on consumer cannabis purchases (established by a 2018 voter decision)

  • 6% state sales tax. If brought into effect, this new wholesale tax would elevate Michigan's cannabis tax system to one of the most intricate nationwide.

Reasons for the Industry's Lawsuit

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) contends that the tax is unconstitutional. Their core argument is:

The 2018 voter-enacted marijuana legislation cannot be altered without a supermajority approval.

The Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), which legalized recreational cannabis usage by voter consent, requires a three-fourths supermajority for any legislative modifications.

Image 2

Nonetheless, the legislators approved the wholesale tax with just a simple majority.

The MCIA's spokesperson, Rose Tantraphol, highlighted the importance in reports covered by Michigan Advance:

“We are representing Michigan’s electorate in court to safeguard the integrity of the voter’s decision.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Industry representatives caution that this tax might elevate consumer costs, burden small businesses, and redirect consumers back to unregulated channels—a trend similar to that in high-tax regions like California.

Schedule a Fee Consultation
Let's set you up for financial success
Book Call

State's Defense of the Tax

Michigan’s administration defends the tax, emphasizing that:

  • The wholesale tax is distinct and does not modify the 2018 cannabis law.

  • The legislative branch holds the prerogative to implement taxes to fulfill fiscal needs.

  • Its intent is solely to bolster road infrastructure, not to adjust cannabis regulations.

Should the judiciary rule in favor, the tax could commence on January 1, 2026.

Impact on Consumers Nationwide

Image 3

Americans beyond Michigan should remain cognizant, as cannabis tax frameworks often mirror each other across the nation. If this new tax endures the legal challenge:

  • Wholesale expenses will escalate.

  • Retailers may hike prices to cope.

  • Consumers might pivot to unregulated markets seeking cost-effective solutions.

  • Smaller businesses might face consolidation pressures.

If overturned, Michigan’s current tax framework — an already cost-effective model compared to other states — will persist.

Broad Impact of Michigan’s Legal Case

While currently unfolding in Michigan, the ramifications of this lawsuit extend across state lines.

1. Tests Voter-Law Boundaries: If legislature-imposed taxes succeed without supermajority backing, it could redefine the purpose and function of voter initiatives nationwide.

2. Influences Cannabis Tax Models: Other states grappling with infrastructure deficits might consider emulating Michigan’s approach if deemed successful.

3. Highlights Disparities in Cannabis Taxation: While states like Oregon and Michigan moderate taxes to maintain market competitiveness, others like California witness illicit markets thrive amid elevated taxes.

Michigan’s lawsuit could become a template for addressing tax disputes in other jurisdictions.

Next Steps in the Legal Proceedings

With Michigan’s Court of Claims judge having reviewed preliminary arguments, a decision is anticipated soon. Ultimately, the case might escalate to Michigan’s Supreme Court.

Regardless of the outcome, the decision will have substantial implications—not only for Michigan’s cannabis enterprises but for state-level handling of voter-approved statutes, burgeoning sectors, and tax jurisdiction nationwide.

Schedule a Fee Consultation
Let's set you up for financial success
Book Call
Share this article...

Want tax & accounting tips and insights?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .