DON’T FORGET: The tax deadline is fast approaching. Contact us to get started on your return today.
Can Pets Be Tax Dependents? Delving Into a Unique IRS Case
If you’ve ever scrutinized your pet’s yearly vet bills, grooming charges, daycare fees, and specialty food expenses, you might find yourself thinking, “This creature is as much a dependent as any human.” You’re not alone—this sentiment is currently being tested in a federal courtroom. 
In December 2025, New York attorney Amanda Reynolds lodged a lawsuit against the IRS, petitioning for her eight-year-old golden retriever, Finnegan, to be acknowledged as a dependent for tax purposes.
While the lawsuit might seem eccentric or even humorous, it touches upon a pertinent tax consideration pondered by numerous Americans each year: Are pet-related expenses deductible? If not, what are the reasons?
Here’s a look into the core of the case, an overview of existing tax laws, and the scenarios where tax benefits for animal-related expenses might apply.
The Lawsuit: Meeting Dependent Criteria
Reynolds argues that Finnegan fulfills the IRS's criteria for considering a dependent because:
he resides with her full-time,
possesses no income, and
she covers more than half of his costs (estimated over $5,000 annually for food, medical care, daycare, etc.).
A news report featuring the filing highlights Reynolds’s declaration, “Finnegan is akin to a daughter and absolutely a ‘dependent,’” within the complaint.
Reynolds also raises constitutional claims, contending that current IRS rules unfairly differentiate based on "species," which is a potential Equal Protection breach, and that not acknowledging pets for tax purposes equates to an improper "taking" under the Fifth Amendment.
Current Case Status
The litigation is being contested in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, yet it’s temporarily paused.
A federal magistrate has issued a stay on discovery (halting evidence gathering) as the IRS prepares a motion to dismiss the case. Judicial remarks refer to the lawsuit as raising a “novel but urgent question” regarding domestic animals as potential tax dependents. However, similar notes suggest significant challenges ahead, with the claims being *“unlikely to withstand a dismissal.”
In essence, the case remains valid and noteworthy, though the courts express skepticism about its success.
Why Federal Tax Law Doesn’t Recognize Pets as Dependents
The crux of this legal battle lies in the tax code where dependents are classified as “individuals.” 
Under Internal Revenue Code Section 152, a dependent is designated as a “qualifying child” or “qualifying relative,” typically referring to human beings due to the consistent use of the term “individual.”
Thus, IRS guidelines don’t accommodate pets as dependents because dependents need a Social Security or taxpayer identification number, aligning benefits such as credits and deductions closely with human familial and household relations.
While Reynolds contends Finnegan meets the functional dependency criteria (living with her, no income, wholly supported), the code's framework isn’t aligned to treat animals as such.
Animal-Related Tax Benefits
Although routine pet expenses are generally not deductible, certain exceptions can apply, offering valuable insights:
1) Service Animals as Medical Deductions
If an animal is a trained service animal assisting with a disability, relevant expenses might qualify as medical deductions if you itemize on your return.The IRS clarifies that medical expenses could be deductible if they exceed AGI thresholds. Costs for acquiring, training, and maintaining qualified service animals may meet these criteria.
Note: Emotional support animals generally do not qualify as deductible without specific training related to a disability.
2) Business Animals as Deductible Expenses
Animals involved in a legitimate business—examples include:
a guard dog protecting business property
animals integral to pest control
These can qualify as typical business expenses, given proper documentation and business necessity. This is one of the few scenarios where animal-related tax breaks apply.
3) Foster Care Deductions
Taxpayers fostering animals for recognized organizations can deduct specific unreimbursed expenses as charitable contributions, if consistent with stringent rules and accurate records.
Conclusion for Taxpayers
This legal proceeding might strike a chord emotionally—pets are cherished family members carrying real costs. However, tax laws prioritize statutory definitions over emotion.
Pets cannot be claimed as dependents on federal tax filings.
Routine pet expenses (food, vet care, grooming) typically remain nondeductible.
Certain animal-related costs may be deductible in specific cases—service animals, valid business animals, and foster-related deductions.
The Reynolds case is worth monitoring. While few experts believe the IRS will assign dependent ID numbers to pets, it emphasizes the significant emotional and financial roles pets play in households and the sharp dichotomy tax policies maintain between “family” and “property.”
Ultimately, prior to presuming a deduction eligibility, it’s advisable to verify actual IRS recognitions.
Sign up for our newsletter.
Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.
We care about the protection of your data.