Every February, the Super Bowl serves as the ultimate spectacle of American sports. While fans across the country are captivated by last-minute touchdowns and high-budget halftime performances, those of us in the tax and financial planning world are often looking at a different set of numbers. This year, the conversation shifted from the field to the balance sheet as the tax implications of the big game became a national headline.
The 2026 Super Bowl concluded with a hard-fought victory for the Seattle Seahawks over the New England Patriots. However, for quarterback Sam Darnold, the celebration was followed by a sobering lesson in U.S. tax law. His experience highlights how location and income apportionment can transform a significant payday into a net financial loss, a scenario that holds valuable lessons for any professional earning income across state lines.
Under current NFL collective bargaining agreements, players on the winning Super Bowl team receive a standardized bonus. For Super Bowl LX, that payout sat at $178,000 per player. While that is a substantial sum for a single game, the tax reality is far more complex.

Because the game took place in California—a state notorious for having some of the highest income tax rates in the country—the players became subject to the “jock tax.” This isn't a specific separate tax, but rather a nickname for how states tax non-resident athletes and entertainers on income earned while working within their borders.
California calculates this tax based on “duty days.” This includes every day spent in the state for the game, including practices, media days, and official team meetings. When analysts applied this formula to Darnold’s multi-million dollar contract, the results were startling. Estimates suggested his California tax liability ranged between $200,000 and $249,000.
In short: his tax bill for the week effectively exceeded the value of the Super Bowl bonus itself. Some projections indicated he may have ended up paying $71,000 more in taxes than he actually received in bonus cash. While specific models vary based on exemptions and deductions, the core takeaway is undeniable: state-level income sourcing can drastically erode even the most significant windfalls.
At Veritas Planning Advisors, we often work with clients who assume these “jock taxes” only apply to celebrities. In reality, the underlying principles of nexus and apportionment apply to many high-impact professionals, especially those in our local Somerville, New Jersey community who frequently travel to New York, Pennsylvania, or beyond.

You might encounter similar multi-state tax hurdles if you:
Many jurisdictions require a non-resident tax filing if you earn income within their borders, sometimes even for a single day of work. For consultants and SaaS founders with multi-state footprints, failing to plan for these allocations can lead to significant surprises during filing season.
The tax complexities of the Super Bowl aren't reserved for the players on the field. Fans who participated in sports betting also face a changing landscape. All gambling winnings are considered taxable income at the federal level, regardless of whether you receive a W-2G form from the sportsbook.
A critical shift occurred with the 2025 federal tax overhaul. Starting in the 2026 tax year, taxpayers are limited in how they can offset winnings with losses. Generally, you can now only deduct gambling losses up to 90% of your winnings, a departure from the 100% deduction allowed in the past.
This 10% gap creates what we call “phantom income.” This is taxable income that appears on your return even if you didn't actually make a net profit for the year. If you won $10,000 but lost $10,000, you would still be taxed on $1,000 of “income” that you don't actually have in your pocket. For frequent bettors, this can result in a surprise tax bill despite breaking even.
While most of us won't face a six-figure tax bill for a single week of work like Sam Darnold, the lesson remains: income doesn't exist in a vacuum. Whether you are managing a medical practice, scaling a software company, or navigating a complex executive compensation package, understanding how different jurisdictions view your earnings is essential.

At Veritas Planning Advisors, we specialize in helping professionals gain clarity over these complexities. From S-Corp optimization to multi-entity planning, our goal is to ensure you keep more of what you earn through smart, proactive strategies.
If your financial life involves multiple states, complex bonuses, or significant investment income, don't wait for a “Darnold-sized” surprise. Reach out to our team in Somerville to schedule a strategy session and ensure your tax plan is as robust as your growth goals.
To truly grasp the magnitude of these liabilities, one must look at the specific formulas states use to claim their piece of the professional pie. In the case of professional athletes, the duty day method is the standard, but for the average business owner or high-earning consultant in Somerville, the rules are often dictated by physical presence or the convenience of the employer test. For instance, if you are a New Jersey resident working for a firm in New York, you are likely already familiar with the complexities of state tax credits. However, when you add a third or fourth state into the mix—perhaps due to a speaking engagement in California or a month-long project in Illinois—the bookkeeping requirements become significantly more demanding. Each state has its own threshold for when a non-resident must file a return. Some jurisdictions use a de minimis rule, allowing a few days of work before a filing is triggered, while others are much more aggressive, requiring reporting from the very first dollar earned within their borders.
For our clients in the medical and legal fields, this often manifests when practicing across state lines. Telemedicine and multi-jurisdictional legal consultations have made it easier than ever to earn income in states where you do not reside. This is where proactive entity structuring becomes vital. By utilizing S-Corp optimization and ensuring reasonable compensation levels are strictly maintained, business owners can often mitigate the double taxation effect that occurs when multiple states lay claim to the same dollar of income. Our team focuses on restructuring entities to ensure that income is recognized in the most tax-efficient manner possible, often yielding significant annual savings for SaaS founders and medical practice owners who operate on a national scale.
One of the most powerful tools currently available to our business clients is the Pass-Through Entity or PTE tax election. In New Jersey, the Business Alternative Income Tax, commonly known as BAIT, allows S-Corps and partnerships to pay state income tax at the entity level. This serves as a vital workaround for the federal State and Local Tax deduction cap, which has been a significant hurdle for high-income earners. By paying the tax at the entity level, the business owner receives a credit on their individual state return, effectively making the state tax a deductible business expense for federal purposes. When you are dealing with a jock tax scenario or multi-state income, coordinating these PTE elections across different jurisdictions is a high-level strategy that requires precise timing and integrated financial models.
The mention of the 2026 tax overhaul in relation to gambling losses is also a harbinger of broader changes. Many provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act are set to sunset or evolve, affecting everything from individual tax brackets to estate tax exemptions. For families focused on generational wealth transfer, the Sam Darnold story is a reminder that the gross number of a windfall is rarely the net number. Whether it is a Super Bowl bonus, a large commission check, or the sale of a business, the timing of the income and the jurisdiction in which it is recognized are the two most critical levers in tax planning. We emphasize smart automation and integrated bookkeeping to track these variables in real-time, allowing for mid-year adjustments rather than reactive scrambling when tax season arrives.
The specifics of the Section 165(d) changes are particularly relevant for those who view sports betting as more than just a casual hobby. By limiting the deduction of losses to 90% of winnings, the IRS has effectively increased the tax burden on gambling activities. This phantom income can also push taxpayers into higher brackets, potentially phasing out other deductions or triggering the Alternative Minimum Tax. For professionals who travel for business and perhaps visit a casino or place bets in a legal jurisdiction, keeping meticulous records of every wager, win, and loss is no longer optional—it is a defensive necessity. This level of detail is something we advocate for in all areas of bookkeeping, whether it involves business travel expenses or personal investment portfolios.
In Somerville and the surrounding Central Jersey area, we are uniquely positioned between several major economic hubs. This proximity is a benefit for growth but a challenge for compliance. Our firm’s hybrid methodology combines these high-end tax strategies with the modern technology needed to track them. We don't just look at the tax bill after the fact; we look at the lifestyle and business decisions that lead up to it. By integrating payroll, bookkeeping, and tax preparation into a single advisory path, we ensure that no duty days are overlooked and no reciprocity agreements are ignored. Whether you are a professional athlete or a local entrepreneur, the goal is the same: ensuring that your hard-earned victories aren't overshadowed by avoidable tax liabilities.
Effective tax planning also involves looking at the long-term strategy of retirement and estate planning. For high-impact professionals, strategies like Roth conversions can be used to manage future tax liabilities. If a professional finds themselves in a lower tax bracket during a year with less multi-state travel, it may be the ideal time to convert traditional IRA funds to a Roth account, locking in lower rates before the 2026 changes take full effect. Furthermore, for those involved in charitable giving, strategies like Qualified Charitable Distributions can be used to offset high-income years. If a professional finds themselves in a higher tax bracket due to a one-time bonus or multi-state project, directing a portion of their required distributions to a non-profit or faith-based organization can lower their adjusted gross income. This integrated approach—looking at investments, business structure, and personal goals simultaneously—is what provides the clarity needed to navigate the shifting landscape of tax law. Just as a championship team relies on a playbook that accounts for every possible defensive alignment, a successful financial strategy must account for every possible taxing authority.
Finally, it is important to consider the impact of state-specific credits and incentives. For example, some states offer credits for taxes paid to other jurisdictions, which can help offset the cost of a jock tax bill. However, these credits are not always dollar-for-dollar and can be limited by various state-level adjustments. Our role as advisors is to model these scenarios in advance, providing our clients with a clear picture of their projected tax liability before they ever set foot in a new state for business. By staying ahead of the curve and utilizing proactive planning, we help our clients grow with less stress and more financial control, turning complex tax challenges into opportunities for strategic wealth building.
Sign up for our newsletter.